โอมเพี๊ยงสล็อต

“People’s Constitution” to take down “Prayut regime” rejected by parliament

Parliament rejected a draft of the so-called “People’s Constitution,” a proposed legislation to take down what Thais call the “Prayut regime” and scrap the 20 year nationwide technique. A former Democrat candidate advised Thai PBS World that “Prayut regime” essentially permits the prime minister to manage the Senate and other organisations mandated beneath the charter.
The “People’s Constitution” draft was rejected by parliament yesterday, with 249 MPs and 224 senators voting against it, whereas 203 MPs and 3 senators voted in favour. But the secretary common of the Progressive Movement and a non-party reincarnation of the now-defunct Future Forward get together, urged the public to not lose hope.
Being driedfruitthailand of the draft in addition to monarchy reform, Piyabutr Saengkanokkul from the Progressive Movement says he hopes that the opposition MPs who voted in favor of the draft will embrace the constitution issue of their parties’ policy platforms for the following election despite the fact that the present Constitution was written to make amending the country’s supreme regulation a troublesome task.
He urged fellow reformers to maintain combating for true democracy and not to surrender their hope that the current Constitution may be altered one day, added that every one attempts to change the Constitution by the folks, as provided by the constitution, have been obstructed and have did not move even their first readings in parliament.
Piyabutr, together with Parit Wacharasindhu, a leader of the reformist group “Re-Solution”, appeared collectively in entrance of Parliament on Tuesday to defend the draft and pleaded members of the Thai parliament to be open-minded, claiming that the proposed legislation is meant to dismantle the so-called “Prayut regime” that offers more power to PM Prayut Chan-o-cha and replace it with a fairer system that benefits all stakeholders.
Parit “Itim” Wacharasindhu, a significant supporter of the People’s Constitution draft, expressed disappointment that the amendments draft was rejected outright by government MPs and senators.
He claims that the reformists’ proposal doesn’t promote any drastic adjustments to the current political structure and received’t disadvantage any political actors, including that Parliament’s rejection was simply another attempt to “close the door” on any transfer to change the present Constitution..

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top